3425 views 7 comments

Additives that actually work?

Ioannis Mavromichalis
Let's talk about additives for broilers - additives that bring a substantial return on investment. I was recently part of a discussion group where it was summarily assumed that not many of the commercially available (nutritional) additives actually seem to work (at least under their conditions).

Of course, this was a private group discussing internal operations, but the point is there are at least some nutritionists or producers who desperately need solutions to problems through additives but are at a loss when it comes to which products can actually help them.

So, which additives work in your opinion? I am not asking about brand names, just general categories for which there is a consensus in the poultry industry. For example, I am sure few would argue with me when I say that phytase should be an integral part of any broiler diet that seeks to keep cost low by reducing (expensive) inorganic phosphate additions. But, some would argue with me if I were to claim that phytase also enhances energy and/or amino acid digestibility. It has happened!

Organic acids also come to mind as one more example of a nutritional additive that finds widespread acceptance in antibiotic-free formulations, but again here, not all organic acids are similar. I had very good experiences with a couple of those, but surprisingly not always!

It would be counterproductive to talk about those additives we believe as ineffective, but we all have good experiences with nutritional additives that actually enhance performance, improve health, reduce mortality, and in general make more money for the producer than they cost to be used. I would also hasten to add here that I strongly believe certain additives work under certain conditions, which sometimes remained largely undefined - a prime example here could be (again in my own experience) yeast derivative products.

So, now, you have my own positive experiences with a few nutritional additives.

What’s your story?


  • no-profile-image

    dr.zulkernain akhter

    yes thats right. We should take natural additives in practice rather than the commericial products available in market.

  • no-profile-image

    Ricardo Hume

    Which organic acid/s work in your opinion with corn-soy diets and at what use level?
    Thank you

  • no-profile-image

    Swamy Haladi

    With my experience on broiler nutrition, probiotics/prebiotics, mycotoxin binders and organic trace minerals are key to realize the full genetic potential. Probiotcs/prebiotics are key as the gut health is the single most important driver of animal performance and profitability. Binders are important as insurance because we never know what load of grains contain mycotoxins. Finally organic trace minerals help birds to achieve optimum immunity and performance better than inorganic trace minerals. i hope this helps

  • no-profile-image

    Aziz Sacranie

    I have been in the industry for longer than I wish to remember, the lesson I have learnt that additives do work and are essential in modern poultry production however the criteria to evaluate them is necessary. My crietria is based on scientific reasearch and peer reviwed papers on the product. Not just claims

  • no-profile-image

    Ilan Ben Gal

    Our company is engaged for about 15 years a combination of probiotic products with organic acids. Our experience has shown that broilers can be grown without the use of drugs with similar cost growth of commercial poultry

  • no-profile-image


    When talking about aditives-we must not forget also plant derivated aditives, which can sometimes have very strong AB properties and can help to control unspecific gut diseases!

  • no-profile-image

    V. Anas

    We should take a closer look on Cysteamine complex feed additive, since conducted trials in most condition brought substantial benefit.

Load more comments (3)

Or register to be able to comment.